Navy should barter for additional Submarines if Plans for new Carrier Battle Group (CBG) are shelved – Indian Defence Research Wing

SOURCE: TUSHKAR SHIRODKAR / FOR MY TAKE / IDRW.ORG.

CDS General Bipin Rawat a while ago confirmed reports that Navy’s plan for third aircraft carrier might be shelved as the country faces economic turmoil due to global pandemic situation and big-ticket projects like an aircraft carrier and Carrier Battle Group (CBG) in support of an aircraft carrier will simply drain the resources with the limited budget country has allocated for the Indian armed forces.

Indian Navy has been planning to have three Carrier Battle Groups (CBG) to tackle the Chinese Navy’s growing plans to operate outside its domain, particularly focus kept to beef up its capabilities to operate in the Indian ocean which Indian Navy always calls its backyard. New Satellite images of Gwadar Port in Pakistan, Cambodia, and Myanmar confirms the Chinese Navy’s plans to develop permanent naval facilities to operate and move warships in the area to secure its oil supplies in case of war in the region.

If India can’t afford to operate a third Carrier Battle Groups (CBG) then it has to ensure that the Indian Navy at least gets the next big thing in the terms of offensive firepower in the sea which are submarines which Indian Navy lacks even at the moment. India’s plan to operate 30 conventional submarines has been in teethers and slow execution of Project-75 and lack of progress in the tendering process of Project-75I only have made it difficult for the Indian Navy to operate desired submarines forces it once had planned.

India should procure more submarines under Project-75 and let Private sector shipyards to manufacture more submarines under Project-75I, while State-owned shipyards continue to focus on the development of Nuclear-Attack Submarines under a covert project which will take at least a decade to mature. Indian Navy’s current fleet of conventional submarines is already aging and will need to be replaced soon and if we stick to original plans it will take another decade or more to reach one to one replacement capabilities which are not enough.

Disclaimer : Articles published under ” MY TAKE ” are articles written by Guest Writers and Opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. IDRW.ORG is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information on this article. All information is provided on an as-is basis. The information, facts or opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of IDRW.ORG and IDRW.ORG does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same. article is for information purposes only and not intended to constitute professional advice .
Article by TUSHKAR SHIRODKAR ,  cannot be republished Partially or Full without consent from Writer or idrw.org

Source link

Leave a Reply